Cases 11 - 20 of 161
Fitzpatrick v. Birmingham, City of
as 2:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
Tameka Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Birmingham, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Patrick D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Coke v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Markus Coke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama, Birmingham Police Department and Zydeco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ervin v. Woodfin et al
as 1:2022cv04202
Plaintiff:
Rayfield Ervin
Defendant:
Mayor Woodfin and City of Birmingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, et al
as 22-13363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA and JAMON K. ANDREWS
Turner v. City of Birmingham Police Dept
as 2:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Janisa Rosann Turner
Defendant:
City of Birmingham Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
