Cases 11 - 20 of 1,865
Ellis v. Philbin
as 1:2024cv02825
Petitioner:
Marlon Maurice Ellis
Respondent:
Edward Philbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SOUTHSTATE BANK NA v. F-5 VENTURES INC et al
as 5:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
SOUTHSTATE BANK NA
Defendant:
GREGORY ELLIS ROBBINS, SHANNON LYNN ROBBINS and F-5 VENTURES INC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Priscilla Ellis v. USA, et al
as 24-11729
Respondent:
WARDEN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
PRISCILLA ANN ELLIS
Derousseau v. Winter Haven Police Dept. et al
as 8:2024cv01120
Defendant:
Venessa Valencia, Polk County Jail, Bruce Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Chenel Derousseau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKiver v. Sineweee et al
as 8:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
Deandre Lashun McKiver
Defendant:
Sergeant Sineweee and Officer Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAVALIERE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
GRAYSON CAVALIERE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP, WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WALMART INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
