Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00573
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Simmons v. Monserrate et al
as 1:2010cv23529
Plaintiff:
Simmons Bruce
Defendant:
Juan R. Monserrate, Maggie Rosado, Vivian Bonet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. AUGUSTINE et al
as 5:2010cv00219
Defendant:
PAIGE AUGUSTINE, HARRELL WATTS, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Plaintiff:
LEWIS CARL BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Hill v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-12233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, B.O.P. Director, WARDEN CONSTANCE REESE, FCI Talladega, WILLIAM ELSTON and others
Dumonde v. Lappin et al
as 2:2010cv00339
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lafitte Dumonde
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv00676
Petitioner:
Demetrius Hill
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, REGIONAL DIRECTORS OVER SPECIAL MANAGEMENT UNITS, U.S.P. SPECIAL HOUSING UNITS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Lappin et al
as 5:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Marquise Carter
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Kevin Cimock and Mary Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Edwin Guzman-Garcia v. Harley Lappin
as 10-11000
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWIN I GUZMAN-GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, BOP Director
Theris v. Lappin
as 1:2010cv00273
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Theris
Respondent:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Velazquez v. Weinman et al
as 1:2010cv20046
Plaintiff:
Israel Rodriguez Velazquez
Defendant:
Beth Weinman, John Baxter and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
