Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Thomas v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00305
Plaintiff: Otis Jerome Thomas
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Katherine Thomas v. Darren Moody, et al
as 15-13732
Plaintiff / Appellant: KATHERINE THOMAS, individually, and as the administrator of the estate of Christopher Jerome Thomas
Defendant / Appellee: DARREN MOODY, in his individual capacity and CITY OF DOTHAN, ALABAMA
Eddie Thomas v. USA
as 16-16844
Petitioner - Appellant: EDDIE JEROME THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2016cv20647
Plaintiff: Jerome Thomas
Defendant: State of Florida and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Katherine Thomas v. Darren Moody, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-13732
Plaintiff - Appellant: KATHERINE THOMAS, individually, and as the administrator of the estate of Christopher Jerome Thomas
Defendant - Appellee: DARREN MOODY, in his individual capacity and CITY OF DOTHAN, ALABAMA
Thomas v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv08029
Petitioner: Eddie Jerome Thomas
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02186
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv03168
Petitioner: Jerome Thomas, Jr
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2010cv02749
Petitioner: Michael Jerome Thomas
Respondent: Gary Hetzel and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Thomas v. USA
as 10-10675
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES JEROME THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?