Cases 11 - 20 of 801
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05974
Plaintiff:
SAMMIE L. JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gregory Lane v. Mayor of Eatonville, Florida, et al
as 23-10700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY R. LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR OF EATONVILLE, FLORIDA, ROBERT L. JONES, WASHINGTON and others
JEFFERSON v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04681
Plaintiff:
TROY JEFFERSON, JENNIFER LIGHT, ROBERT SUMMERS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watkins v. McKinney et al
as 2:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Sheila K Watkins and Shelia Watkins
Defendant:
Daniel McKinney, Jeri Wink, Cynthia L Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv03633
Plaintiff:
QUINCY L JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JONES v. JOHN DOE et al
as 7:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
BRYAN L JONES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Warden BEASLEY, Deputy Warden MARCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HELVEY v. JONES
as 5:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
HEATH LEE HELVEY
Defendant:
DWAYNE L JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nyka O'Connor v. Julie L. Jones, et al
as 22-14173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NYKA TASSIANT O'CONNOR
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIE L. JONES, Former Secretary FDOC: Individual Capacity, CHUANG T. LE, Former Medical Doctor & Chief Health Officer: Individual & Official Capacity, S. JOHNSON, Nurse; Individual & Official Capacity and others
JONES v. WALMART
as 5:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
BERTHA JONES and BERTHA L JONES
Defendant:
WALMART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. David Jones, Jr.
as 22-13702
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID L. JONES, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
