Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Hicks v. Whipple et al
as 0:2018cv60452
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Hicks
Defendant:
Lawrence A. Whipple, Jr. , Whipple Law P.A. and MSW Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hicks v. Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 0:2018cv60248
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Hicks
Defendant:
Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC and MSW Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hicks v. Merchants' Choice Payment Solutions of Florida, LLC
as 8:2017cv01078
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Hicks
Defendant:
Merchants' Choice Payment Solutions of Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Roy Hicks v. Officer Day, et al
as 17-11468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY L. HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER DAY, Correctional Officer, OFFICER PASTAWAY, Correctional Officer, CAPTAIN ROBINSON, Correctional Officer and others
Page v. Hicks et al
as 2:2016cv01993
Plaintiff:
Ashley Wilcox Page
Defendant:
Todd L Hicks , Susan P McMullan , Peter M Tofani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Hicks et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2016cv00902
Plaintiff:
Ashley Wilcox Page
Defendant:
Todd L. Hicks , Susan P. McMullan , Peter M. Tofani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Chatman et al
as 5:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
ROY L HICKS
Defendant:
BRUCE CHATMAN, Eutsey, CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Chatman et al
as 1:2016cv00421
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Hicks
Defendant:
Bruce Chatman, Eutsey, Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Hicks
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Aldridge Conners, LLP , Assurant, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
LeCroy et al v. Wilbros, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Ray LeCroy , Diane LeCroy , Catherine Addison and others
Defendant:
Wilbros, LLC , Environmental Concepts, LLC , Wilcorp, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
