Cases 11 - 20 of 76
MARTIN et al v. HOLT et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Judge BEVERLY B MARTIN, Khalid Mouton and BEVERLY B MARTIN
Defendant:
PO AHMED HOLT, ROBERT TOOLE, STAN SHEPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Leisa Garcia
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Michael Anderson, Marquette Sistrunk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14859
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Dustin Heminger, et al v. USA
as 22-10286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSTIN HEMINGER, MICHAEL ANDERSON, DUSTIN NEWELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Heminger et al v. The United States of America
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Dustin Heminger, Michael Anderson, Dustin Newell and others
Defendant:
The United States of America
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65398
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
