Cases 11 - 20 of 24
PEREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17971
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79360
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER et al v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03250
Plaintiff:
MICKY BROOKS, MARK GERASIMAS, RANADA LOWE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Posadas v. United States Of America
as 2:2019cv00041
Petitioner:
Miguel Perez Posadas
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clark et al v. Conway et al
as 1:2018cv05416
Plaintiff:
Kelda Lisette Gordon, Nicolas Stewart, Wali K. Bascoe and others
Defendant:
Lt. Col. Carl Sims and R.L. (Butch) Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rives v. Ounze Corporate, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv21467
Plaintiff:
Javier Rives
Defendant:
Ounze Corporate, LLC and Juan Miguel Perez Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Perez v. Overhead Door Corporation
as 6:2015cv01373
Plaintiff:
Miguel Perez
Defendant:
Overhead Door Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Perez v. The State of Florida
as 8:2013cv00067
Plaintiff:
Wascar Miguel Perez Perez
Defendant:
The State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. The State of Florida
as 6:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wascar Miguel Perez Perez
Defendant:
The State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zamora et al v. Escandon et al
as 2:2008cv00539
Plaintiff:
Odalis Zamora, Adan Antonio, Cutberto Escandon and others
Defendant:
East Coast Right Of Way Maintenance, Inc., Robert W. Smith and Michael Deluca
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
