Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Jacobson v. NaphCare Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03632
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
Naph Care Inc., Medical Director at Fulton County Jail, John Does (I-III) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of William C. Barnett et al v. NaphCare, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02890
Plaintiff:
The Estate of William C. Barnett, Adrian Barnett, William Christopher Barnett and others
Defendant:
NaphCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Szekely v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv24377
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Naphcare, Inc. and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Szekely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Szekely v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv24375
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Naphcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Szekely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Szekely v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv24376
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Naphcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Szekely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harris v. Chronister et al
as 8:2020cv00657
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc., Chad Chronister and Brian Christopher Bochert
Plaintiff:
Jessie Thomas Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Antonio Devon May et al v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv02440
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Antonio Devon May, April M. Myrick and Sheena Pettigrew
Defendant:
Sergeant John Doe, John Doe Deputies, Fulton County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boeji v. Naphcare Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv03080
Plaintiff:
Edward Gordon Boeji
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc. and D. Luscznski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drinkard v. Onderdonk et al
as 1:2018cv00450
Defendant:
Ms. Wise, Sgt. Turner, Corporal D. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Drinkard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
