Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., et al v. Walker County, Alabama, et al
as 21-11387
Defendant / Appellant:
TOMMY OSWALT, WALKER COUNTY, ALABAMA and COLBERT COUNTY, ALABAMA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
OSWALT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87335
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACH OSWALT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OSWALT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61123
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL OSWALT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. Calhoun County et al
as 1:2020cv00955
Defendant:
Calhoun County Probation Office, Steven Walker, Matthew Wades and others
Plaintiff:
Detrick Elston Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roche Diagnostics Corporation et al v. Priority Healthcare Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01479
Defendant:
Tombigbee Pharmacy LLC, Ashley Tigrett, Jasper Express Care Pharmacy LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Roche Diabetes Care Inc and Roche Diagnostics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Oswalt v. Dayk Enterprises Inc
as 7:2018cv01321
Plaintiff:
Jerry Oswalt
Defendant:
Dayk Enterprises Inc and Dayk Enterprises Inc doing business as Country Inn & Suites
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Richardson et al v. Oswalt
as 7:2017cv01873
Plaintiff:
Hubert Richardson and Kemetha Richardson
Defendant:
Dorothy Dean Oswalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
