Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Braddy v. Hunter et al
as 3:2016cv01554
Plaintiff:
DAndre Braddy
Defendant:
P. M Hunter, Jeffrey McClellan, M. D. Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson et al v. Bailey et al
as 2:2015cv00880
Plaintiff:
Kayla Watson , P. M. and M. W.
Defendant:
Russell Michael Bailey and Centurion-Eagle Auto Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Poole et al
as 5:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Donna Maggert Poole, Lauren Maggert, P. M. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Metzger II v. Jones et al
as 8:2015cv02628
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Metzger II
Defendant:
Julie Jones, P. M. Rodgers, Dana Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
P&M Corporate Finance, LLC v. Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A. et al
as 0:2015cv60736
Plaintiff:
P&M Corporate Finance, LLC
Defendant:
Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A., David J. Stern and John Doe Fraudulent Transferees 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SPRINGS v. GIELOW
as 3:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS L SPRINGS
Defendant:
W L GIELOW, M ALLEN, A BEASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Waiters v. P.M. Stoddard, et al
as 13-14139
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MELVIN WAITERS
Defendant - Appellant:
D. L. CONCEPCION, P. M. STODDARD, MATTHEW OWEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tower Insurance Company of New York v. Aledith Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv22689
Plaintiff:
Tower Insurance Company of New York
Defendant:
Aledith Enterprises, Inc. and A. P. M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. MASSEY, et al
as 4:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN ALONZO BAKER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER D MASSEY, SMITH, GIVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
