Cases 11 - 20 of 1,209
USA v. Michael Etheridge
as 24-10035
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL CLINTON NICDAO ETHERIDGE, a.k.a Michael Clinton Etheridge
Hope v. International Paper Company et al
as 2:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Clinton Hope
Defendant:
International Paper Company, Mike Closson and Jim Bruce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Keyton v. City of South Fulton et al
as 1:2023cv04947
Plaintiff:
Clinton M. Keyton
Defendant:
City of South Fulton and Detective Joseph King
Rice v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
Brian K Rice
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Kenneth Boswell, Ray L Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLINTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv35089
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY CLINTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powers v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Powers
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Jeffery McClellan, S. Tollick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROOSA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34661
Plaintiff:
CLINTON ROOSA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv35019
Plaintiff:
CLINTON FORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLINTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33482
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLINTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30723
Plaintiff:
CLINTON BOWERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
