Cases 11 - 20 of 160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Natt v. Prison Officials
as 1:2022cv04701
Plaintiff:
LaWayne Natt
Defendant:
Prison Officials, Prison Official Pollard, Prison Official Dukes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cobble v. Warden et al
as 1:2022cv03635
Petitioner:
Daniel Cobble
Respondent:
Warden, U.S. G.D.P. Director in DC and U.S. Marshall Chief in Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. United States Marshal Service
as 8:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
Trask O'ryan Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratcliff v. United States of America et al
as 8:2022cv02010
Petitioner:
David Marc Ratcliff
Respondent:
United States of America and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Caudle v. U.S. Marshalls et al
as 5:2022cv01100
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
U.S. Marshalls and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. USP Atlanta et al
as 1:2022cv03028
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
USP Atlanta, Dept. of Trans., USP Atlanta Sanitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew James Choy v. United States Southern District of Florida, et al
as 22-10273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES CHOY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, BOP, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
