Cases 11 - 20 of 3,479
Daniel Woods v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Ser
as 24-11815
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WOODS
Defendant:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
WOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
CHARITY NOELLE WOOD
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Morris et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kennin Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Deputy, Mr. Morris, Deputy, Mr. A. Wood, Deputy, Mr. Stearns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Wood et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenn Wood, Major Eric Smith, Sgt Josh Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iacono v. Woods et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Aca Daniel Iacono
Defendant:
Captain Danny Woods, Sheriff Rick Kelley and Southern Health Partners Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Pierce County et al
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Davey Green
Defendant:
Pierce County, Charlie Wichman, Gregory Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vinton Woods LLC v. Brown
as 1:2024cv01823
Plaintiff:
Vinton Woods LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Brown
Petitioner:
Aris Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Baggett v. Officer Joshua Washburn et al
as 2:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Sherry Baggett
Defendant:
Officer Joshua Washburn, Donald Wood, Deputy Sheriff J.L. Chestnut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Insurance Pipeline Inc.
as 0:2024cv60483
Plaintiff:
Dajah Woods
Defendant:
Insurance Pipeline Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv02180
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Sgt. Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
