Cases 11 - 20 of 26
MORGAN et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03327
Plaintiff:
SEAN ALLEN, TRENT JANOSA, SHAWN ROE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZARKEVICS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03184
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BALOH, JOSHUA DREISBACH, JONATHAN BURRELL and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MILLS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01525
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW COX, REED FRENCH, JASON LAIR and others
Defendant:
DOES ONE THROUGH FIFTY and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black v. Woods (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
David Black
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scotto v. Smiesk et al
as 8:2016cv02941
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
Jeff Smiesk, Brett Hart, Oscar Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LabMD, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
as 16-16270
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER, PRIVACY AND SECURITY LAW PROFESSORS, BRADLEY SECREST and others
Petitioner:
LABMD, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Chanel, Inc. v. 7morris7 et al
as 0:2016cv61785
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
7morris7, agustin lopez, akmk fortunata espinal and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Freeman v. Lake Wales Police Department et al
as 8:2015cv01622
Plaintiff:
George Freeman, Jr.
Defendant:
Lake Wales Police Department, David Black, Olivia Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BLACK et al v. BRUNSON et al
as 4:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
DAVID BLACK and DANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BRUNSON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HODGES v. GROCHOWSKI
as 4:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
TOMMY DWAYNE HODGES
Defendant:
MICHAEL W GROCHOWSKI, DAVID BLACK, MARY ANN SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
