Cases 21 - 30 of 10,320
Mitchell v. Lavorado et al
as 6:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
James Jonathan Mitchell
Respondent:
M Lavorado, Daiquiri Duncan, Lopez and others
Defendant:
Sgt. M Lavorado, Warden Daiquiri Duncan, Sgt. Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Mcneal v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mcneal
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Ross v. Guildford et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Rodney Patrick Ross
Defendant:
Jonathan Andrew Guildford, Stacie Irving and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ross v. Guilford et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Rodney Patrick Ross
Defendant:
Jonathan Andrew Guilford, Stacie Irving and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
FLOYD et al v. USI INSURANCE SERVICES LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
SHARRIF K. FLOYD, THE ANDREWS INSTITUTE AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER, LLC and THE ANDREWS INSTITUTE AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER LLC
Defendant:
USI Insurance Services LLC, Marsh USA Inc. and MARSH USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Williams v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Curtis Andrew Williams
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Tyrone Oliver, Michael W. Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayers v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00078
Defendant:
Rockstar Games UK Limited, Microsoft Corporation, Nintendo of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
