Cases 21 - 30 of 1,406
SHORTER-ARNOLD v. HINSON
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
CHRISSY NOELLE SHORTER ARNOLD and CHRISSY NOELLE SHORTER-ARNOLD
Defendant:
ERIC HINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bryan Arnold
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Arnold v. Car-D-Nel, Inc
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold
Defendant:
Car-D-Nel, Inc doing business as Maxi Auto Service Centers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gray v. Miami-Dade County
as 1:2024cv20739
Plaintiff:
David Arnold Gray
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Byron T Arnold
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Sword and McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Charity Palmer, Ashley Terry, Melissa Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2024cv14077
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Ruth Outlaw and Susan M Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells Fargo Bank,N.A. v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2024cv14076
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank,N.A.
Defendant:
Ruth Outlaw and Susan M Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
