Cases 21 - 30 of 30
FREEMAN v. THOMSON et al
as 3:2018cv02095
Defendant:
CLIFFTON, STANLEY, MACESON and others
Plaintiff:
LEON FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Thomson et al
as 1:2018cv23197
Defendant:
Officer Stanley, Officer Thomson, Officer Cliffton and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Cliffton Mormon
as 15-12960
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLIFFTON S. MORMON, a.k.a. Kurt, a.k.a. Curt, a.k.a. Tippy, a.k.a. Tip
INMAN v. STATE BAR OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L INMAN
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF GEORGIA, WILLIAM P SMITH, III, ROBERT E MCCORMACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Watson et al
as 0:2014cv60646
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Linda D. Watson, Alice Metaxa , Morgan Metaxa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Warren v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2012cv01728
Petitioner:
Cliffton Warren
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Warren v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2012cv00425
Petitioner:
Cliffton Warren
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mosley v. Cliffton et al
as 3:2008cv00082
Plaintiff:
David Mosley
Defendant:
Chris E. Cliffton and Daniel E. Brannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latiesha Brooks, et al v. Cagle's, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
//All Plaintiffs//, //All Plaintiffs//, //All Plaintiffs// and others
Defendant:
Cagle's, Inc., Cagle's, Inc., Cagle's, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
