Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Bailey v Adams, et al.
as 1:2020cv00097
Defendant:
DANIEL ADAMS, State National Insurance Company, Inc. and FLOYD INC
Plaintiff:
DESHAUN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
BAILEY v ADAMS, et al.
as 4:2019cv00176
Defendant:
DANIEL ADAMS, STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY INC and FLOYD INC
Plaintiff:
DESHAUN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Adams et al v. Kia Motors America, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv00250
Plaintiff:
Christine Adams and Daniel Adams
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, Kia Motors America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Taylor v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00661
Plaintiff:
Princeton T. Taylor
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Ricky Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2016cv00661
Plaintiff:
Princeton T. Taylor
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Ricky Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Meeks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00448
Plaintiff:
Princeton T. Taylor
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Ricky Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Medlin et al
as 3:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Phillip Daniel Adams
Defendant:
Jason Medlin and Pat Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv00686
Plaintiff:
Daniel Adam Summers
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marlowe v. Roesner et al
as 5:2011cv00468
Plaintiff:
Daniel Adam Marlowe
Defendant:
Donald Roesner, Mark Clifton and Wal Mart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANAL INDEMNITY COMPANY v. COASTWIDE DISASTER RELIEF AND RECOVERY, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00412
Plaintiff:
CANAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
COASTWIDE DISASTER RELIEF AND RECOVERY LLC, DANIEL ADAMS, JOE A ALONSO and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
