Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Drayton et al v. McIntosh County, Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04274
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frances Drayton , Carolyn Banks , Melvin Banks, Sr. and others
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Georgia, C. Brett Cook, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wilson v. Ansbacher
as 3:2015cv01011
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Jordan J. Ansbacher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOWELL et al v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
ZENA A HOWELL and HARRY LEE HOWELL
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK BIOTECH INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jonathan Williams
as 15-12514
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN HARRY LEE WILLIAMS
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. City Central Condominium Unit Owners' Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00445
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
City Central Condominium Unit Owners' Association, Inc., Safe Harbor Developers, Inc., Charles Michael Manley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Boggs v. Ellis et al
as 4:2014cv00202
Defendant:
J Ellis, A Hammock, Crickmar and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Boggs, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 14-12359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, REED, Lt., KEIVEN SPRAYBERRY and others
Boggs et al v. Willingham et al
as 4:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Defendant:
Willingham, Crickmar, Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Hammoc et al
as 4:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Defendant:
Hammoc, Reed, Keiven Sprayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Butler v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 14-10797
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY LEE BUTLER
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
