Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Crenshaw v. Jones
as 1:2016cv00564
Petitioner:
Fredrick Crenshaw
Respondent:
K. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv01209
Plaintiff:
Teresa K. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Abercrombie v. McDonald et al
as 4:2015cv01902
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Abercrombie
Defendant:
C.O. McDonald, D. Dennis, C. Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCLG LLC v. JONES
as 5:2015cv00204
Petitioner:
SCLG LLC and LARRY EALY
Respondent:
RICHARD K JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IN RE: ConAgra Peanut Butter Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2007md01845
Defendant:
DG Retail, LLC, Dolgencorp, Inc., David Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Hernandez, Jr., Jason Shultis, Shawndreeca Davis and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Jodi Ann Arias, Mr. Matthew H. Kaye and others
Not Classified By Court:
John Brugh, III
In Re:
IN RE: ConAgra Peanut Butter Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Claude Jones
as 14-14233
Petitioner:
In re: CLAUDE K. JONES
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jones v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01254
Plaintiff:
Marvin K. Jones
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Sacramento County Department of Child Support Services, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian et al v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 7:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
Stanley R Christian and Nancy K Jones-Christian
Defendant:
Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company , Scientific Expert Analysis , Robert Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
JONES v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2012cv00458
Plaintiff:
DARYL K JONES
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL, CORIZON HEALTH INC, HAU THIEN HUYHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
