Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Wiggins v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00116
Defendant:
Chardonnay Dialysis Inc., Dr. Sharon Lewis, Dr. Mary Alston and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Mclain Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travion Reid v. Scott Wilkes, et al
as 18-11502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVION REID
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT WILKES, Former Warden, RUTHIE SHELTON, Deputy Warden of Care and Treatment, MARY ALSTAN, Medical Director and others
Hinson v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mark Hinson, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Ruthie Shelton, Augusta State Medical Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Travion Reid
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Ruthie Shelton, Mary Alstan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00288
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD
Plaintiff:
RUTHIE M JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. Reed et al
as 1:2017cv00934
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Defendant:
Rudolph L. Reed and Ruthie Lee Culver-Reed
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reid v. Wilkes et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Travion Reid
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Stan Shepard, Ruthie Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Agravante et al v. MJ Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv23935
Defendant:
MJ Transportation, Inc. and Joseph Patrick Hawker
Plaintiff:
Ruthie Agravante and Napoleon Agravante
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
