Cases 21 - 30 of 20,950
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JADUE v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv22106
Plaintiff:
SERGIO JADUE
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., AMAZON STUDIOS, LLC, AMAZON VIDEO BRASIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Thomas-Lormil v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
Myrlande Thomas-Lormil
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ricky Johnson v. Heather Turner, et al
as 24-11799
Plaintiff:
RICKY J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
HEATHER TURNER, SHARON LEWIS and THOMAS FERRELL
THOMAS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
SHAMEKA THOMAS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wandell v. Buck et al
as 8:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Wandell
Defendant:
Benjamin Waldo Buck and Thomas Charles Fielding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Neese
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
David cook
Defendant:
thomas neese, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00676
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berry v. McFarland et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Marion Jewitt Berry
Defendant:
Warden Andrew McFarland, Cpt. Kellom, Cert Sgt. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
