Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Shiyang Huang v. Brian Spector, et al
as 20-10249
Defendant / Appellee:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, a foreign limited liability company, DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, TRUSTED ID, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM R. PORTER, JAMES MCGONNIGAL, RANDOLPH JEFFERSON CARY, III and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHIYANG HUANG, CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS, ALICE M FLOWERS and others
Amicus Curiae:
JAY EDELSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv01545
Petitioner:
Melvin W. Davis
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DAVIS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01395
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
OSCAR W DAVIS, JR and JULIE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Roy Davis
as 17-13086
Petitioner:
In re: ROY W. DAVIS
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. NSB Niederelbe Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG et al
as 4:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Davis
Defendant:
NSB Niederelbe Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG , Maersk Line A/S CO and Mediterranean Shipping Company (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
