Cases 21 - 30 of 4,858
Walker v. Peters
as 6:2024cv00943
Petitioner:
Richard Barrett Dale Walker
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
RASHADA v. HATHCOCK et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
JADEN RASHADA
Defendant:
HUGH HATHCOCK, WILLIAM NAPIER, MARCUS CASTRO-WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
WALKER v. PATE
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
AMOS WALKER
Defendant:
PATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JAMES COKER, TIMOTHY NOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Andrew Walker
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BROWN v. AMANDA et al
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
AMANDA, WALKER, DENISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoutamire et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad Stoutamire, Juan Provencio, Patrick Prudish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
TUCKER v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER
Defendant:
MARK HARRIS, ALETHEA HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
