Cases 31 - 40 of 3,088
USA v. Jamares Jordan
as 24-11182
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMARES LEVELL JORDAN
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
CARPENTER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jordan Carpenter and Jordan Carpenter on behalf of the Estate of Dennis Carpernter
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Danielle Rawl, Brittney Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Jordan et al
as 8:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Jordan, Chad Chronister, Doctor Ogga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. BUTTS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
JORDAN WATSON and JORDAN A WATSON
Respondent:
BUTTS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, THOMAS H WILSON, MICHAEL PARISH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Juan Delgado v. Bloomberg L.P., et al
as 24-11021
Plaintiff:
JUAN JOSE RENDON DELGADO
Defendant:
BLOOMBERG L.P., JORDAN ROBERTSON and MICHAEL RILEY
Owens v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Jordan Owens
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Antitrust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kaczmarczyk v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jordan D. Kaczmarczyk
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
