Cases 31 - 40 of 266
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Taylor et al v. University Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
University Health Services, Inc. and Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
ASH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06940
Plaintiff:
LEE ASH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Park Plus, Inc. v. The Automated Parking Company, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv60587
Plaintiff:
Park Plus, Inc.
Defendant:
The Automated Parking Company, LLC and Ash Jenkins
Ash v. JPay
as 1:2023cv21081
Plaintiff:
David Leon Ash, III
Defendant:
JPay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Agro Holdings LLC et al v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Agro Holdings LLC, Alameda Aggregates LLC, Aquatic Creek LLC and others
Defendant:
Arden Row Assets LLC, United States of America, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Ashe
as 2:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Ms. Johnnie Marene Thomas
Defendant:
William R. Ashe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ASHING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02816
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHARLES ASHING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ashe et al v. Hargrave et al
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael W Ashe, L Ashe Sheri, Michael W. Ashe and others
Defendant:
Kevin Hargrave, Tiffany L Hargrave, Federal Trade Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.