Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Carlos Garza v. T. Scott Hudson, et al
as 11-10114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS GARZA
Defendant - Appellee:
T. SCOTT HUDSON, U.S. Probation Office, Atlanta, GA, WILLIAM H. THOMAS, JR., Assistant U.S. Attorney, WILLIAM A. MORRISON, Attorney at Law and others
Garza v. Hudson et al
as 1:2010cv04023
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garza
Defendant:
T. Scott Hudson, William H. Thomas, Jr., William A. Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leverette v. Martin
as 1:2010cv02291
Plaintiff:
Charles Leverette
Defendant:
Beverly B. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Kahn et al
as 1:2010cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jessie Ray Cox
Defendant:
Thomas K. Kahn , James N. Hatten , John Ley and others
Martin et al v. City of Tampa, FL
as 8:2008cv02252
Plaintiff:
Allan S. Martin, Allan S. Martin, Marie B. Martin and others
Defendant:
City of Tampa, FL and City of Tampa, FL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dillard, et al v. Chilton Co. Comm., et al
as 2:1987cv01179
Plaintiff:
John Dillard , Damascus Crittenden, Jr. , Earwen Ferrell and others
Defendant:
Chilton County Commission and Robert B. Martin
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Robert R. Binion , John Wright , Gilbert Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007mi00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Windham v. Martin et al
as 1:2007cv02900
Plaintiff:
Corey E. Windham
Defendant:
Beverly B. Martin and Carol Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
