Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Henning v. Bennet
as 6:2015cv00881
Plaintiff: Bryan Henning
Defendant: Rhonda H. Bennet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SPEED v. JACKSON
as 5:2015cv00108
Plaintiff: DANIAL ROBERT SPEED
Defendant: M JACKSON, A OBRIAN, J FIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. City of Dalton, Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00278
Plaintiff: Danny Troy Carroll
Defendant: City of Dalton, Georgia, Dalton Police Department, M. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Baldwin County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00184
Plaintiff: Donald Eugene Gardner, III
Defendant: Baldwin County, Sheriff Mack, Officer Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eccles v. Jenkins Correctional Facility et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv00114
Plaintiff: Kevin Eccles
Defendant: Jenkins Correctional Facility, Ralph Kemp and Bennet Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Bennet et al
as 3:2013cv00723
Plaintiff: Michael Haynes
Defendant: Bennet and U.C.I. Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Bennet et al
as 3:2013cv00688
Plaintiff: Michael Haynes
Defendant: Officer Bennet and U.C.I. Security Correctional Officers, of U.C.I. Mental Health Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. U.C.I. Security et al
as 3:2013cv00627
Plaintiff: Michael Haynes
Defendant: U.C.I. Security, Officer Bennet and Officer Browney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Bennet
as 3:2013cv00551
Plaintiff: Michael Haynes
Defendant: Bennet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Aniston et al
as 3:2013cv00546
Plaintiff: Michael Haynes
Defendant: Aniston, Bennet and U.C.I. Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?