Cases 31 - 40 of 1,184
CAZARES v. ZEAIN et al
as 4:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
GILBERT CAZARES
Defendant:
USA, ARCHER, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinkle v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Steven Joshua Dinkle
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons and National Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aloba v. Bureau of Prison
as 5:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Oriyomi Aloba
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ellis v. Garland et al
as 8:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ann Ellis
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Lisa Monaco, United States Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Woods v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Shed Woods
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr Ventuo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stahlman v. Lane et al
as 5:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID STAHLMAN
Defendant:
KATHY P. LANE and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seabrooke v. Inch et al
as 2:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael Seabrooke, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark S. Inch and Director Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerrick v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Bernard Randal Kerrick
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
