Cases 31 - 40 of 412
Arthur Ballard v. General Motors LLC
as 23-12309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR HENRY BALLARD, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph Ryan Ballard, Deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
BALLARD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BALLARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv14011
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BALLARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ballard v. Broling
as 6:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
James Ballard
Defendant:
John Lyon Broling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. State of Florida et al
as 6:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
James Ballard
Defendant:
State of Florida and Brian Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. Nagel
as 6:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
James Lee Ballard
Defendant:
Ryan Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OPTIO RX LLC et al v. CRESTVIEW CITY PHARMACY INC et al
as 3:2023cv08993
Plaintiff:
Optio Rx, LLC, Aliette Rodz, OPTIO RX LLC and others
Defendant:
Crestview City Pharmacy, Inc., Jennifer Reshay Densman, Christopher Neil Densman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
BALLARD v. BROLING et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Defendant:
JOHN LYON BROLING, BRIAN C RODGERS and EDGAR JONES III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braxton et al v. Stokes et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Patrick Braxton, James Ballard, Barbara Patrick and others
Defendant:
Haywood Stokes, III, Gary Broussard, Jesse Donald Leverett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. Cail et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
James Ballard
Defendant:
Jody Cail and Brian C. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
