Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Caples v. Mt. Ararat Missionary Baptist Church et al
as 1:2012cv00540
Plaintiff:
Mary Caples
Defendant:
Mt. Ararat Missionary Baptist Church, Mt. Ararat Learning & Development Center, Robert Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams et al v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Adams , Thomas Adams , Jacqueline Alexander and others
Defendant:
Bally Gaming, Inc. , Cadillac Jack, Inc. , IGT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mann v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv00361
Plaintiff:
John W. Mann
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Tammy Crager and FNU Caples
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sena v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 9:2007cv81120
Plaintiff:
John M. Sena, John M. Sena, John Sena Agency, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Palmer v. Feldman et al
as 8:2007cv01426
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Leona Palmer
Defendant:
Madeline Feldman, Martha Maggos, Michelle Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. Feldman et al
as 8:2007cv01323
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Leona Palmer
Defendant:
Madeline Feldman, Martha Maggos, Michelle Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caple v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2007cv01075
Plaintiff:
Edward Caple, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CAPLES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2007cv00219
Petitioner:
ROY EDWARD CAPLES
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
