Cases 31 - 40 of 233
Segun Akerele v. Fulton County Court House
as 22-10357
Petitioner / Appellant:
SEGUN AKERELE
Respondent / Appellee:
FULTON COUNTY COURT HOUSE
Akerele v. Fulton County Court House
as 1:2022cv00485
Petitioner:
Segon Akerele
Respondent:
Fulton County Court House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv14013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Akerele v. Fulton County Court House
as 1:2021cv05215
Petitioner:
Segon Akerele and Segun Akerele
Respondent:
Fulton County Court House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Harris v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01178
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harris
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Florida State Prison, Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMahon v. State of Indiana et al
as 0:2021cv62225
Plaintiff:
Krystal McMahon
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Marion County Court, Aaron Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LANE v. THE CIRCUIT COUNTY COURT IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA
as 3:2021cv00903
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ELLIOTT LANE, SR
Defendant:
THE CIRCUIT COUNTY COURT IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles
as 2:2021cv00847
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles and Montgomery County Court
Plaintiff:
Eddie Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYE v. PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00839
Defendant:
PPD, ESCAMBIA COUNTY COURTS and PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
QUYMINE BRYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
