Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 355
Cobble v. Chasteen et al
as 1:2020cv02927
Respondent: U. S. Government and James Chasteen, Jr.
Petitioner: Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02929
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Cobble v. U. S. Government et al
as 1:2020cv02928
Defendant: Georgia Attorney General, Tennesse Attorney General, Texas Attorney General and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Daniel Cobble
as 20-11522
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner: In re: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cobble v. US Government et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00273
Defendant: Hamilton County Tennessee Government, Johnny Wayne Plemons, Jr., Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Daniel Cobble
as 20-10842
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner: In re: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Daniel Cobble v. USA
as 20-10628
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Daniel Cobble v. USA, et al
as 20-10569
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Daniel Cobble v. U.S. Government
as 20-10552
Respondent / Appellee: U.S. GOVERNMENT, nationwide and all states, all agents, all of the federal staff
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cobble v. All U.S. District Court Magistrate Judges Serving, et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00031
Plaintiff: Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant: U. S. Government Nationally and all U.S. District Court Magistrate Judges Serving with the Court of Montgomery Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?