Cases 31 - 40 of 97
RICHARDSON v. MACON BIBB COUNTY et al
as 5:2020cv00322
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, MACON BIBB COUNTY, MACON BIBB SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Richardson and CHRISTOPHER RAYSHAWN RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2020cv00320
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, Deputy Lawrence Prichard, Deputy Devin Keith and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Richardson, ATTORNEY DEBRA G GOMEZ and CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70848
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv35764
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv01067
Petitioner:
David Davis
Defendant:
MARK S. INCH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAYS v. DAVIS
as 5:2020cv00169
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Plaintiff:
RAY MAYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv76843
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv68771
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVID DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLE v. DAVIS
as 5:2020cv00136
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRELL v. DAVIS
as 5:2020cv00139
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Plaintiff:
LE CHARLES HARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
