Cases 31 - 40 of 25,186
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11472
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Michael Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11482
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HENDERSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Cody Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11522
Petitioner:
CODY EDWARD DAVIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Osvaldo Lazo v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11469
Petitioner:
OSVALDO LAZO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Vasquez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
Golden Vasquez
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Golden Vasquez
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Charlotte Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant:
Charlotte Correctional Institution, Department of Corrections, Officer Yatiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard Cuminotto v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11474
Petitioner:
LEONARD CUMINOTTO
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Secretary
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 2:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
