Cases 31 - 40 of 1,554
Yi v. Dept of Justice
as 6:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Jin Hee Yi
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vinayagam v. US Dept Labor-Adminisrative Review Board et al
as 1:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
Nithya Vinayagam
Defendant:
US Dept Labor-Adminisrative Review Board, Swapna Pasham, EIS Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
FLOYD v. SECRETARY FLA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
CRAIG FLOYD
Respondent:
SECRETARY FLA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. U.S. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2024cv00984
Petitioner:
Sung Min Lee
Respondent:
U.S. Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petitphait v. Winter Springs Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Rafael J. Petitphait
Defendant:
Winter Springs Police Department, Ofc. Aldridge, Orlando Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cesar v. Dept. of Justice
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Son Oswald Cesar
Defendant:
Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yi v. Dept of Justice
as 6:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jin Hee Yi
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cortez v. Dept of Justice
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Clara Cortez
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Middleton v. Uhaul Company et al
as 4:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Delano A. Middleton
Defendant:
Uhaul Company, City of Savannah Police Dept., Sheriff John Wilcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez v. Dept of Justice
as 6:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Clara Cortez
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
