Cases 31 - 40 of 241
WILLIAMS v. KILBY et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
TAYMAR FREDERICK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN RICHARD KILBY, WARDEN OF SECURITY MCCLUNG, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN WILKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. FORT et al
as 5:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
KARL FORT, TIMOTHY C WARD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIDLEY v. EMMERSEN et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE DAVID EMMERSEN, JUDGE ANN HARRIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenny v. Fort
as 1:2022cv00854
Petitioner:
Walter Lawrence Kenny and Walter Lawrence Kenney
Respondent:
Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foote v. Forte Data Systems, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Hilton Foote
Defendant:
Forte Data Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
JOHNSON v. FORT
as 5:2022cv00050
Petitioner:
DERRICK A JOHNSON
Respondent:
KARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KENNEY v. FORT
as 1:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
WALTER LAWRENCE KENNEY
Respondent:
WARDEN CARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KENNEY v. FORT
as 5:2021cv00462
Petitioner:
WALTER LAWRENCE KENNEY
Respondent:
WARDEN CARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
