Cases 31 - 40 of 1,598
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
SNYDER v. SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
ERIC EUGENE SNYDER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, BORIUDIN, LIEUTENANT BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. McCelland et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jamal Leslie Vass, Redbull, Neptune and others
Defendant:
Jeffery McCelland, Gina Bennett, Ashley D. Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Freeman v. Wipro Limited Corp
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
David Freeman
Defendant:
Wipro Limited Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Freeman v. Perry
as 5:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Dwight B. Freeman
Respondent:
James K. Perry
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Perry
as 4:2023cv00334
Petitioner:
Dwight B. Freeman
Respondent:
James K. Perry
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv05405
Petitioner:
Christopher T. Freeman
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Gloria Freeman
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
