Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 55
BAKER et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00899
Plaintiff: RYAN BUTTERS, ROBERT GOODFELLOW, RANDY GARZA and others
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Stephens v. Atlanta Housing Authority, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv01335
Defendant: Atlanta Housing Authority, Georgia, Noel Khalil, Columbia Residential Management and others
Plaintiff: Kalyn Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddick v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2018cv00319
Plaintiff: Allen Riddick
Defendant: Donald Sawyer, FNU Catron and Kristen Kanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIDDICK et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00414
Plaintiff: EUGENE HOOKANO RIDDICK and HEIDI RIDDICK
Defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Riddick v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-10709
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES RIDDICK
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and R. NEWLAND, Physician Assistant, FCC Coleman USP 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00201
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv01957
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Riddick v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2017cv00532
Plaintiff: Harry Riddick
Defendant: Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01855
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01526
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?