Cases 31 - 40 of 220
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLEN v. GEORGIA RENEWABLE POWER LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00042
Defendant:
GRP FRANKLIN LLC doing business as GRP FRANKLIN I LLC, VEOLIA ENERGY OPERATING SERVICES LLC, JOHN DOE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
AGNES MILLEN, JUDY SCHIFFER, DEREK HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. GEORGIA RENEWABLE POWER LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00054
Defendant:
GEORGIA RENEWABLE POWER LLC, GRP FRANKLIN LLC DBA GRP FRANKLIN I LLC, JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY S SMITH and KRISTEN L SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11433
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN S SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Salema et al
as 2:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Emily Salema, J. McDaniels, S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
William Thomas, IV
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe, Emily Salema and S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
William Thomas, IV
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe, Emily Salema, S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv62530
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11576
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. NVR, Inc.
as 6:2020cv02199
Plaintiff:
Donta S Smith, Brittani A Smith, Donta A. Smith and others
Defendant:
NVR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
