Cases 31 - 40 of 63
SCHMITZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08730
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHMITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Insurance Office of America Group, LLC v. Schmitz et al
as 6:2020cv00199
Plaintiff:
Insurance Office of America Group, LLC
Defendant:
Johnson & Williams, P.A., Donna Schmitz and Steven M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
IOU Central, Inc. v. Schmitz et al
as 1:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Eva Investments, Inc., Nadia Sandra Bruno, Bruno Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
IOU Central, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00483
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMITZ v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01745
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SCHMITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv21363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Mayo v. Whitman et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 1:2018cv00146
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Lee Whitman, Dothan Utilities, Billy Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayo v. Whitman et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00780
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Lee Whitman, Dothan Utilities, Billy Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eggleston Mayo v. Whitman et al
as 1:2017cv03786
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Lee Whitman, Dothan Utilities, Billy Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
