Cases 31 - 40 of 368
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 2:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Bar, Texas Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 1:2023cv21315
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Bar, Texas Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Saintillus-Bey v. United States Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023cv20713
Plaintiff:
Shalam Saintillus-Bey
Defendant:
United States Supreme Court, United States Congress and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 2:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Attorney Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Muhammad et al v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kalim A. R. Muhammad and Karima Lakssir Muhammad
Defendant:
Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., Cowin Knowles, Ciara Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 23-10120
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Maore MwendaIn re: Maore Mwenda
as 23-10446
Petitioner:
In re: MAORE MWENDA
Respondent:
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA
Chris Jaye v. USA, et al
as 23-10016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
