Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Copeland v. Jones
as 5:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Julie Jones, FNU Fonde, Michelle Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruco Securities LLC v. US Department of Justice
as 2:2018cv00596
Plaintiff:
Pruco Securities LLC
Defendant:
US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
APONTE-PINTO v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 3:2018cv00443
Petitioner:
MICHAEL APONTE-PINTO
Respondent:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00055
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Becker et al v. US Department of Justice-Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 0:2018cv60146
Plaintiff:
Michael Becker and Corinne Mei
Defendant:
US Department of Justice-Drug Enforcement Administration, Charlotte Wroblewski, Jason Wroblewski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MALLETY v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 3:2017cv00730
Petitioner:
ERNEST MALLETY
Respondent:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watson v. Lambert et al
as 0:2017cv61368
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Defendant:
Al Lambert, John Lewis, Robert Resnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 4:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G WHITE
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIC HOLDER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2017cv00897
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Garrett, Jr
Defendant:
US Department of Justice and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MANSELL v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Corry Marcus Mansell
Defendant:
NANCY A BERRYHILL, US Attorney for Northern District of Florida and Attorney General of the US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
