Cases 31 - 40 of 51
USA v. William White
as 15-10789
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
William White v. William Berger, Sr., et al
as 15-10809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM B. BERGER, SR., ERIC THOMPSON, DONALD ESLINGER and others
USA v. William White
as 14-15525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
WHITE v. OVERGROUP CONSULTING LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00402
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L WHITE
Defendant:
OVERGROUP CONSULTING LLC , JOHN ROSS OVERSTREET and BRENT MAROPIS
Counter_claimant:
BRENT MAROPIS , JOHN ROSS OVERSTREET and OVERGROUP CONSULTING LLC
Counter_defendant:
WILLIAM L WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
White v. Frederick et al
as 6:2014cv01249
Plaintiff:
William Alexander White
Defendant:
Sargeant Frederick, Donald Eslinger and Seminole County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Eslinger et al
as 6:2014cv01247
Plaintiff:
William Alexander White
Defendant:
Donald Eslinger and Seminole County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Eslinger et al
as 6:2014cv00936
Plaintiff:
William A. White
Defendant:
William Berger, Sr., Eric Thompson, Donald Eslinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William White v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 14-12127
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM MELVIN WHITE
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
James McConico, Jr. v. Cochran, et al
as 14-11949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MCCONICO, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COCHRAN, A Domestic Prossessional Corporation, JUSTIN M. TAYLOR, Attorney, JAMES W. PARKMAN, III, Attorney and others
McConico v. The Cochran Firm et al
as 2:2014cv00656
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
The Cochran Firm, Justin Taylor, James W Parkman, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
