Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Sutton v. Bentley et al
as 5:2015cv00792
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Deric LaVelle May
Defendant:
James Smith and Bryant Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Hetzel et al
as 1:2014cv00155
Plaintiff:
Deric LaVelle May
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Penny Emmons and James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, The v. Smith
as 4:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, The
Defendant:
James Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hill v. Hetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kim Thomas, Michael Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. Alabama, State of et al
as 5:2012cv02751
Plaintiff:
Gary Seals, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Department of Corrections, Jerrydean Cunningham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. McSwain-Holland et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2012cv00687
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Davidson
Defendant:
Sharon McSwain-Holland, Jesse Youngblood and James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ivory James Smith
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McBee v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2012cv01029
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy Patrick, Dorthy Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Auburn University, et al (MAG+)
as 2:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Defendant:
Auburn University, The Auburn University Board of Trustees, Raymond J. Harbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
