Cases 41 - 50 of 540
Terese Jones v. Pope Francis, et al
as 23-12671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERESE E. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
POPE FRANCIS and TRACY B. MAGWOOD
POPE v. HOUSTON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY QUENTON RAMSEY, DEPUTY RESPREE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Bergoglio et al
as 8:2023cv01613
Plaintiff:
Terese E. Jones
Defendant:
Pope Francis Jorge Mario Bergoglio and Tracy B. Magwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Pope, Jr. v. Warren Cook, et al
as 23-12435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. POPE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARREN COOK, REGINALD RAMBO and CARL SANDERS
POPE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18671
Plaintiff:
SHAWN POPE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Pope, Jr. v. Officer Dozier, et al
as 23-12266
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL D. POPE, JR.
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICER DOZIER and SHOULDERS
Burriss et al v. U. S. Supreme Court et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Burriss, Raymond Edwards, Melvin Brinson and others
Defendant:
U. S. Supreme Court, U.S. Grand Jury, U.S. Justice Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lane et al
as 3:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Nathan J. Davis
Defendant:
Lane, V. Pope-Jones and Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glen Spivey v. Leonard Schiofman, et al
as 23-12091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN DALE SPIVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LEONARD SCHIOFMAN, ISAAC MOORE, C. E. RICHARDSON and others
Brown v. Chatham County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Brown
Defendant:
Chatham County Jail, Sgt. Tabor, Pvt. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
