Cases 41 - 50 of 17,730
BASS v. SMITH et al
as 4:2024cv00171
Defendant:
REGINALD THOMPSON, CHATTAHOOCHEE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, JUDGE LARAE MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
MARION BASS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PHIPPS v. SMITH et al
as 3:2024cv00604
Respondent:
Col. David M. Skalicky and Lt. Col. Kelsey N. Smith
Petitioner:
Myles L. Phipps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Flagg v. Smith et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv01641
Plaintiff:
Andrea Duhreal Flagg
Defendant:
Lt. Murry, CO Cunningham and Vencini Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne et al v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
David Smith and Kingston Osborne
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05447
Defendant:
The Cooper Companies, Inc., Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith and Katherine Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Watkins, et al. v. 3M Company, et al.
as 2:2024cv01620
Plaintiff:
Leanne Marie Mackey, David Mann, Kandi Mcginne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Forbes v. Consejo De Latinos Unidos, INC et al
as 2:2024cv01618
Defendant:
Thomas A. Fanning, Zeke Smith, Alabama Power Company and others
Plaintiff:
K.B. Forbes and Consejo De Latinos Unidos, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nomusa Smith v. Georgia Secretary of State, et al
as 24-13834
Plaintiff:
NOMUSA VENITA SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
