Cases 41 - 50 of 5,109
Douglas v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Clifton Alexander v. Douglas County Sheriff
as 24-11054
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON Q. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Logan v. Chamber et al
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Douglas DeSean Logan
Defendant:
Warden Brian Chamber, Dr. Adodele Ayedun and Deputy Warden Chabara Bragg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Chambers et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Douglas DeSean Logan
Defendant:
Warden Brian Chambers, Chabara Bragg, Ms. Messier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rigby v. Longleaf Machining, LLC
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Adam Douglas Rigby
Defendant:
Longleaf Machining, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fox v. Pineiro
as 1:2024cv01168
Petitioner:
Michael Douglas Fox
Respondent:
Warden Aaron Pinero and Warden Aaron Pineiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Douglas et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Erika Danielle Douglas and Keiana Danae Douglas
Defendant:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds and Deputy Amanda Gergans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
