Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Sanders v. United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv00117
Petitioner:
Cornell Lorenzo Sanders
Respondent:
United States of America and D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cook v. Drew et al
as 1:2008cv00144
Petitioner:
Gregory Lejuan Cook
Respondent:
D.B. Drew and B Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riley v. Drew et al
as 1:2007cv02128
Petitioner:
Elmer Riley
Respondent:
D.B. Drew, C. Ratledge and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Drew
as 1:2007cv02068
Petitioner:
Sydney George Robinson
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Drew
as 1:2007cv01923
Petitioner:
Christopher B Taylor
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Drew et al
as 1:2007cv01895
Plaintiff:
Wilmer L. Dixon, III
Defendant:
D.B. Drew and T. Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
D.B. et al v. Montgomery County School District
as 2:2007cv00783
Plaintiff:
D.B., D.B., Katrina Warr and others
Defendant:
Montgomery County School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Poole v. Drew et al
as 1:2007cv01503
Petitioner:
Robby Poole
Respondent:
D.B. Drew, H . Mitchell, Federal Correctional Institution Talladega, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baker v. Drew
as 1:2007cv00969
Petitioner:
Harold Scott Baker
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Drew et al
as 2:2007cv00926
Petitioner:
Brandon Brown
Respondent:
D.B. Drew and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
